Evaluating Course Management Systems (CMS) Vendors Assignment

Evaluating Course Management Systems (CMS) Vendors - Assignment ExampleCMS aids organizations in managing content deployed done the internet. Organizations use web CMS in integrating the presence of their web with their different operations (Deo, 2010). This ensures that the content is current, applicable and refreshed. CMS also allows business to gain greater return and extract value from web channel, web converse and web marketing endeavors (Deo, 2010). This topic seeks to identify trey CMS traffickers, and compare and contrast their purchase and alimony cost. This paper will identify three Course Management Systems Vendors compare and contrast the functions and explain how they meet the take and expectation of users. The first CMS vendor is the Database Vendors. This vendor include dynamic web grades in which content is stored and separated from former(a) particulars like format, style, supporting data and access rights. For example the Oracle which has had their own CMS offerings developed. This type of CMS vendor is valuable compared to the others if both maintenance and purchase. Database Vendors have understated and significant misalignment consumer group who has restricted their success in the output class (Deo, 2010). The customer model also has direct access to competent trained IT professionals who directly circulate within the organization to content producers. The second CMS vendor is the Internet Service Provider this includes website hosting and registration of goodness business with competent and intense price which also allows switching costs. Businesses using this vendor are generally interested in means of adding value to customers and help in what may avoid switching amid vendors. This CMS vendor delivers products of content management and site building and delivery of site hosting, domain registration and site development. The products of this vendor are however conceived poorly because they are not the major game of the oper ation. Purchase and maintenance costs are however relatively low compared to Database Vendors (Deo, 2010). The third CMS vendor is the Enterprise CMS Majors. This includes vendors like cartoon and EMC Documentation which produces document management among other manipulation tools and content aggregation. This vendor is used in managing non-web content. The vendor suits organizations moving documents for collaborative authoring within the organization for carefully publishing and version control (Deo, 2010). The vendor whence allows content to be expanded and published in the internet. However, the applications development path makes them on the whole proprietary and complicated. Installation of Enterprise CMS Major requires change management, extended timeline, financial expense, detailed training, and a perpetrate organization in order to ensure success. This makes the cost of purchase and maintenance relatively high compared to the other types of vendors (Deo, 2010). Generally , all the three discussed CMSs are effective and meet the needs of users in various ways. The users benefit from these three CMSs due to their features such as mathematical product of web pages (Chaudhari, 2009). They produce, edit and deploy web pages systemization of web pages turns production and web management into a system of activities delivering efficiency simplification of website production activities. They internalize technical, communication and traffic pattern complexity in the production of websites user management as they manage users at different levels. It regulates who sees what on the site and who can edit and